TCP/IP Stack

[kalle]

Hello,

I'd like to suggest a better TCP/IP Stack. I'm working with MikroC compiler, I have allways been working with MikroC and I'd like to continue working with MikroC. I like the MikroC compiler very much but at the moment I need to use Microchip's C-compiler since there is no acceptable TCP/IP Stack provided by mikroe. I can't understand the size limitations and I can't understand why it is not possible to provide a good stack. At least Microchip is capable of doing so ...
Maybe there would be a chance to transform the Microchip-stack to a usable format with MikroC. I've been spending a lot of money in your compilers and I like them since they are very very good to use and there are many useful libraries.

Maybe you should pay attention to more complexe issues (like the TCP/IP stack) than to mighty simple libs like a SoftPWM library. I think you can do your own SoftPWM within say 10 lines while a TCP/IP stack is too complex to be programmed by a user.

Thank you very much for considering my opinion

[zristic]

Kalle,
It is very difficult to say what is more important softPWM of TCP/IP... maybe someone is making living on softPWM, others on TCP/IP.

From that reason it is very difficult to choose what is older and more important.

We work on both, however, just the time needed for making it right is long.

[mlebel]

I'd like to join Kalle, with his request.

In today's technology, I can't see an embedded module that eventually
don't communicate to the world with TCP/IP, ZigBee or any other modern method.
I think it is important that mikroElektronica, will invest in this direction,
If they want to keep the professionals and not only the hobbies.

You have a good product & a good approach, please make it better.

Meir Lebel

[dnszero]

+1 for TCP/IP stack.

So far this is the only item that has me shopping for other compilers.

[letadyylko]

me too.. +1 for TCP/IP stack