Support for PIC16F1513

General discussion on mikroC PRO for PIC.
Author
Message
fred85
Posts: 187
Joined: 27 Dec 2010 14:50
Location: Canada

Re: Support for PIC16F1513

#16 Post by fred85 » 20 Apr 2014 00:06

p.erasmus wrote:MCHP do not only make 8 bit controllers
Yes I know thats why I specifically said"8b PIC's ".
p.erasmus wrote: a dsPIC33EP or a PIC32 has more power per mega herts than any ARM M3
The PIC32MZ runs at 200Mhz the fastes Flash Mico on the market with the Highest DMIPS or Coremarks
Yep and they also have the 24f series which is a good series as well. Basically I selected ST Because they have a crapload of cheap development boards and there chips are everywhere and a good price.

Example
http://canada.newark.com/stmicroelectro ... dp/06X3667

The price of the board with the display plus some ram other little goodies is the same as the chip alone. They have lots of boards like that.

CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR is similiar

http://canada.newark.com/cypress-semico ... dp/39X7573

You need minumum investment the bulk of cypresses toolchain is free or next to it. The same can be said for ST.

I'm not knocking Microchips 8b line thats why I want an update. I want to use the newer chips with a compiller I paid for. I'll be using 8b PIC's for a long time yet.

steve42lawson
Posts: 183
Joined: 06 Mar 2008 17:35
Location: St. George, UT
Contact:

Re: Support for PIC16F1513

#17 Post by steve42lawson » 20 Apr 2014 17:47

Since I rarely use the MikroC libraries [and if completing library code for the new processors is what is holding up the release] I would be satisfied with a "pre-release" [or beta] with incomplete libraries. I also rarely use the debugger. I just need the basic compiler functionality [with complete "header file"s (you guys call them 'Defs' files {or '.mlk' files})] . So, if the basic compiler is functional, then how 'bout it ;)

BTW: is this correct: '.mlk' stands for Mikro LinK which suggests that they are actually object files that are processed by the linker, and the reason for doing it that way, rather than the usual '.h' header file, is that by pre-compiling those files, it speeds up the compile time for us Users? Is that why MikroC compiles so much faster than the XC8 compiler?

Which suggests the following conspiracy theory: you guys delayed the release of the next set of MikroC for PIC compilers, so we would have to resort to using other compilers and, thus, discover how much faster the MikroC compiler is? ;)
Humility is the lack of the desire to impress, not the lack of being impressive.

User avatar
filip
mikroElektronika team
Posts: 11874
Joined: 25 Jan 2008 09:56

Re: Support for PIC16F1513

#18 Post by filip » 22 Apr 2014 14:20

Hi,

First of all, we are not abandoning the PIC or Microchip families surely.
The new compiler release should be available in the next few weeks, so please have patience, I know it was quite of while when the previous version is released.

Regards,
Filip.

johnsmt795@gmail.com
Posts: 1
Joined: 18 Jan 2024 04:50

Re: Support for PIC16F1513

#19 Post by johnsmt795@gmail.com » 18 Jan 2024 05:09

Looks like the PIC16F1513 is not currently supported by the software.

User avatar
IvanJeremic
mikroElektronika team
Posts: 316
Joined: 05 Sep 2022 14:32

Re: Support for PIC16F1513

#20 Post by IvanJeremic » 19 Jan 2024 11:33

Hi,

PIC16F1513 is supported by Mikro PRO for PIC compilers and by Necto Studio.

Regards,

Ivan.

Post Reply

Return to “mikroC PRO for PIC General”