Adding support for LPC Arm

[Nethacks]

Dear Mikroe team,

You sold boards for LPC Arms.
Why you aren' supporting these in your software.

Best regards,
Nethacks

[marina.petrovic]

Hi,

Adding support for LPC MCUs is already for some time on wish list, but unfortunately,
at this moment I am not able to give you any promise whether and when this MCUs will be supported.

Our software developers and our management team already discussed about this and in future they will certainly again consider it.

Thank you for your understanding.

Best regards,
Marina

[Menelaus]

You now such forum entrys like this????:
http://www.mikrocontroller.net/topic/35 ... 04#3908804

It is not a good promotion for you.

LPC support will be very usefull.
If you have a Basic language for LPC, you the first on the market.

You know such facts????

[marina.petrovic]

Hi,

We know that adding support for LPC MCUs can be very useful, but as I mentioned in my previous answer,
this decision is on our management team and they will certainly consider all aspects.

Thank you for pointing on this forum, we really appreciate it.

Best regards,
Marina

[Menelaus]

It's look like, Mikroe isn't interest in users anymory.
Like this: http://www.mikroe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=187&t=61797

This MCU doesn't have many user.

LPC is a industrial standart !!!

So Mikroe only make money with big hardware manufacture and not with there user.

I am very disappointed for such NEW company style.

[marina.petrovic]

Hi,

I understand your remark but like my colleague explained on the forum topic on which you pointed,
FT900 is one of those MCU where we want to be there from the start.
Work together with FTDI can have just plus effects on the SW of mikroE and all rest compilers.

Adding new compiler in our offer certainly does not mean we forget on our users.
Please note that adding new vendors (like NXP) maybe looks like easy job, but it's on our management team
not on our software developers and they need to consider all the aspects.

Best regards,
Marina