Search found 38 matches
- 22 Nov 2022 04:59
- Forum: mikroC PRO for PIC General
- Topic: optimizer failed
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2212
Re: optimizer failed
Another 5 months gone and still no apparent action!
- 29 Jun 2022 04:55
- Forum: mikroC PRO for PIC General
- Topic: optimizer failed
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2212
Re: optimizer failed
Is there any progress on this bug?
David
David
- 20 May 2022 07:16
- Forum: mikroC PRO for PIC General
- Topic: optimizer failed
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2212
Re: optimizer failed
Thank you Filip.
It is caused by indirect function calls (as previously mentioned).
Regds,
David
It is caused by indirect function calls (as previously mentioned).
Regds,
David
- 11 May 2022 01:47
- Forum: mikroC PRO for PIC General
- Topic: optimizer failed
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2212
Re: optimizer failed
Hello Filip,
Sorry about that. I missed it.
Here it is again. I have unzipped it and all seems to be there.
Regds,
David
Sorry about that. I missed it.
Here it is again. I have unzipped it and all seems to be there.
Regds,
David
- 04 May 2022 10:02
- Forum: mikroC PRO for PIC General
- Topic: optimizer failed
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2212
Re: optimizer failed
Okay, I believe the problem occurs because of indirect function calls.
MPLAB is happy with them, MikroC is not!
For now, I'll do without them. But the Optimizer should not fail!
Regds,
David
MPLAB is happy with them, MikroC is not!
For now, I'll do without them. But the Optimizer should not fail!
Regds,
David
- 02 May 2022 07:44
- Forum: mikroC PRO for PIC General
- Topic: optimizer failed
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2212
Re: optimizer failed
PS: This code compiles okay under MPLAB. However, there are quite a lot of instances of implicit casting which does silly things- such as returning -1 from a function defined as uint8_t. However, I do not think this should stop Mikro PIC-C from finishing a compilation. Some of them might cause the e...
- 30 Apr 2022 05:49
- Forum: mikroC PRO for PIC General
- Topic: optimizer failed
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2212
Re: optimizer failed
Hi filip, when I first started converting this (Arduino) code to PIC and your compiler, the main thing was local variable definitions were scattered through the functions. I do not do that with my own coding and Pic-C did not like it either. So I moved them to the start of each function until compil...
- 30 Apr 2022 03:41
- Forum: mikroC PRO for PIC General
- Topic: optimizer failed
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2212
Re: optimizer failed
Hi,
Thanks for the quick reply.
here it is!
Thanks,
David
PS there is a slight error near the top where a variable name (freddy) is missing from the dummy functions
it is: void geniePutByte(uint8_t ) but should be
void geniePutByte(uint8_t freddy)
Still fails exactly the same with either statement.
Thanks for the quick reply.
here it is!
Thanks,
David
PS there is a slight error near the top where a variable name (freddy) is missing from the dummy functions
it is: void geniePutByte(uint8_t ) but should be
void geniePutByte(uint8_t freddy)
Still fails exactly the same with either statement.
- 29 Apr 2022 09:10
- Forum: mikroC PRO for PIC General
- Topic: optimizer failed
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2212
optimizer failed
I have been using 7.6.0 of the C compiler (with TFT) without any problems for several years now. BUT, in converting some code from a general C library, I have run into a strange problem whereby the code compiles but everything stops with an "Optimizer" failure. I cannot find any information about th...
- 30 Apr 2020 06:32
- Forum: mikroProg™ programmer and debugger
- Topic: mikroProg 2.8 and Pic 18F26K42
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4660
Re: mikroProg 2.8 and Pic 18F26K42
If that happens, I'll ditch them.
Regds,
Dave
Regds,
Dave
- 30 Apr 2020 03:37
- Forum: mikroProg™ programmer and debugger
- Topic: mikroProg 2.8 and Pic 18F26K42
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4660
Re: mikroProg 2.8 and Pic 18F26K42
MikroC for PIC works. I've used it on a number of large projects. MikroProg also works fine (or you can use other programmers if you so desire). However, you have no ICD available with MikroC and MikroProg (despite the fact that their website incorrectly advertised that it was available). That corre...
- 28 Apr 2020 21:20
- Forum: mikroC PRO for PIC General
- Topic: BUG!
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1331
Re: BUG!
I have been informed that the advertising and website are incorrect.
18F26K42 ICD is NOT supported!
Regds,
Dave
18F26K42 ICD is NOT supported!
Regds,
Dave
- 28 Apr 2020 21:17
- Forum: mikroProg™ programmer and debugger
- Topic: mikroProg 2.8 and Pic 18F26K42
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4660
Re: mikroProg 2.8 and Pic 18F26K42
Right, so your website is incorrect and misleading.
Regards,
David
Regards,
David
- 24 Apr 2020 07:37
- Forum: mikroC PRO for PIC General
- Topic: BUG!
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1331
BUG!
I have MikroProC for PIC version 7.6 (latest). I have MikroProg 2.8, firmware V01.16.12.21 (latest). I am using PIC18F26K42 and trying to use ICD. I can set ICD in Project options and this sets background debugging flag in PIC config word plus the build completes okay. Good, because it did not funct...
- 21 Apr 2020 23:11
- Forum: mikroProg™ programmer and debugger
- Topic: mikroProg 2.8 and Pic 18F26K42
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4660
Re: mikroProg 2.8 and Pic 18F26K42
Hello,
I had already done that and just checked again. Firmware is up to date.
So, that is not the problem.
I'll log a bug report.
Regds,
Dave
I had already done that and just checked again. Firmware is up to date.
So, that is not the problem.
I'll log a bug report.
Regds,
Dave