Search found 181 matches
- 07 Nov 2006 14:52
- Forum: mikroBasic Wish List
- Topic: 10fxx support......
- Replies: 40
- Views: 41568
Re: Update!
Should not be more than 2-3 weeks from release I just wanted to ask that :P OK, I am counting days. :twisted: I hope it's 2-3 weeks! Here's my To-Do list :) Create support web-site (Registered domain yesterday) Turn compiler into a web-service Add subversion support Finish bug testing Finish writin...
- 07 Nov 2006 02:20
- Forum: mikroBasic General
- Topic: Budget CNC?
- Replies: 41
- Views: 21209
Hi Cashsale Try pouring cheap nailvarnish remover onto the back of the paper. Just don't move it around! :lol: Pour enough on to make the paper translucent, then apply light pressure to help make it transfer. For more information, try http://www.ruthannzaroff.com/carving/how-to2.htm . It will give ...
- 07 Nov 2006 02:08
- Forum: mikroBasic Wish List
- Topic: 10fxx support......
- Replies: 40
- Views: 41568
Update!
Sorry for lack of updates, but I recently found out I'm going to be a dad :D I now have hex file generation completed - including a good 2-pass assembler! The system has also been updated to allow for many numerical formats (more than mB + MPlab support!), for example, you can use (for hex): 0x12345...
- 02 Nov 2006 01:23
- Forum: mikroBasic General
- Topic: Budget CNC?
- Replies: 41
- Views: 21209
Hi Cashsale Use acetone instead of an iron. Dab it on with a cotton ball & the pattern transfers within a few minutes :) I can produce very fine smt boards without too much trouble. I tried several variations of this with terrible results. It was very difficult to get even penetration of acetone int...
- 15 Oct 2006 02:49
- Forum: mikroBasic Wish List
- Topic: 10fxx support......
- Replies: 40
- Views: 41568
Hi LGR True, but the benefit to using MPLAB is that they already have a simulator, and you also have ICD. But if you want to do you own, I'm sure the package would be a lot more tightly integrated. I haven't tried it myself, but I'm hearing good reports about the usability of ME's ICD. I haven't bee...
- 13 Oct 2006 17:24
- Forum: mikroBasic Wish List
- Topic: 10fxx support......
- Replies: 40
- Views: 41568
Hi LGR Why do you need to write your own assembler? Can't you simply write instructions to download MPLAB, and feed ASM into it? As long as you're not the one doing the distribution, I don't see how that would be a problem. That's how Linux distros get away with using Microsoft TrueType fonts. They ...
- 12 Oct 2006 16:20
- Forum: mikroBasic Wish List
- Topic: 10fxx support......
- Replies: 40
- Views: 41568
Hi Zristic I meant advantages of embedding your assembler into the IDE instead of using MpAsm as the back-end.. There are legal issues with this. Also, that extra step means a user has to install MPLAB (the latest version) with support for all PICs, new definition files, linker scripts... Too many t...
- 12 Oct 2006 13:20
- Forum: mikroBasic General
- Topic: mikroBasic 5.0.0.0 has been released
- Replies: 38
- Views: 22405
Hi Naveen Hi Niki I have been following 10f thread and was wondering at your speed.Just couldn't see u teasing zristic. I think u have started from scratch and build pretty quickly. Giving some competition to ME team? Do u plan to go beyond 10F. After zristc its me now "How soon can we taste it?" ke...
- 12 Oct 2006 13:11
- Forum: mikroBasic Wish List
- Topic: 10fxx support......
- Replies: 40
- Views: 41568
MikroBASIC 10f support
Ok, I've been thinking about MikroBASIC and here are the changes you would have to make to include 10F support: Remove Gosub/Return No functions or procedures No (mB) function calls within expressions Reduce stack usage to 8 bytes or less (easy with the above removed) That's the limitations I'm havi...
- 12 Oct 2006 12:53
- Forum: mikroBasic General
- Topic: mikroBasic 5.0.0.0 has been released
- Replies: 38
- Views: 22405
- 12 Oct 2006 12:44
- Forum: mikroBasic General
- Topic: mikroBasic 5.0.0.0 has been released
- Replies: 38
- Views: 22405
- 12 Oct 2006 12:39
- Forum: mikroBasic Wish List
- Topic: 10fxx support......
- Replies: 40
- Views: 41568
If I may ask, what advantages/disadvantages did you find with implementing your own assembler in mB? It is not our own asm, it is much like mchip's asm, just that the names of variables are longer and clearer, for the sake of Easier reading/debugging. Btw, after you release the first version, when ...
- 11 Oct 2006 23:35
- Forum: mikroBasic Wish List
- Topic: 10fxx support......
- Replies: 40
- Views: 41568
- 11 Oct 2006 16:05
- Forum: mikroBasic Wish List
- Topic: 10fxx support......
- Replies: 40
- Views: 41568
- 11 Oct 2006 14:00
- Forum: mikroBasic Wish List
- Topic: 10fxx support......
- Replies: 40
- Views: 41568
Another update: I've managed to include full expression support now :D The compiler converts all expressions to Reverse Polish Notation (A retlw table in PICs) and includes an RPN stack calculator to work it out. This method is about half the speed of mB's inline approach, but allows for greater cod...