Ok, that explains a lot of the pain I've been having recently with the new 18F26K42 and MikroBasic. I've written (and tested) most of my program on a 18F45K22 and then started porting it to the new K42, which will be the target device used in the product. I was thinking that since most of the progra...

Windows 8.1 x64, mikroProg works perfectly fine.

Also, if you have Windows 8, consider upgrading to 8.1 (for free in the Store). I wouldn't recommend using the "original" Win 8, unless there's a good reason for it.

Hi,
you might find the following application note very useful.

http://www.microchip.com/wwwAppNotes/Ap ... e=en020394

Regards,
Tomas

Sure, why not. Just send the data from the PC to the PIC and then let the PIC to store them in the EEPROM. You can do it one byte at a time (slow) or (better) send a block of data and buffer it in the PIC's RAM.

Hi, it seems OK at the first glance... should work. Anyway, try this version, I added a comparator configuration line. program test main: ' Main program TRISA = $01 TRISB = $00 LATA = $00 LATB = $00 ADCON1 = $0F CMCON = $07 while true if PORTA.0 = 1 then LATB = $04 else LATB = $00 end if delay_ms(10...

<sorry, wrong button... please delete this post>

FINALLY! I finally got that bloody thing working! Now working on the key repeat timer. program Keypad_2 ' First completely working version. ' IMPORTANT!!! Disable the PORTB A/D in the project settings! dim Row, Col, DebCounter as byte RawKey, Debounce as byte dim Buffer as byte[2] dim Key as string[...

mlike wrote:Díky, opět jsi poradil Marek

Jé čau, já si nevšiml, že jsi to ty. Každopádě, glad to help.

Hi Tomas, no it does not. That is indeed still one of the main issues, but it would require a lot of effort to add it to the tool, so I will not make it for the moment. :? It is a pity that mB does not know something as the "with" statement. Hi Dany, thanks for the info. I can very well imagine tha...

Hi Dany,
thanks for your good work (as always).
Does the new version translate the "with" statement (which is absent in mB) or we still have to correct those sections manually?
Thanks!

Tomas

@lejeff: Of course, you're right. I forgot to edit the ISR. Thanks for pointing that out. @billtech: Have you tried using the lookup table instead of the calculation (with lejeff's bug fix)? If so, what does it do? Anyway, I'm really out of ideas here... It shouldn't take us a week to program someth...

Hi guys, I tried to debug the program on hardware with a 4x4 keypad, but unfortunately, my good and trusty PIC18F45K22 just died on me this weekend. :roll: It was also behaving erratically before it died which would explain why I wasn't able to debug a simple matrix keyboard program over two evening...

Maybe the interrupt from the other 4 rows (RB4,RB5,RB6,RB7) is not interrupt the software normally? Hi billtech, since I rarely use the IOC feature, I didn't realize that it will respond to both edges of the signal - it will trigger again when the button is released, which then messes up the readin...

Dammit... Nah, the new equation is good, I actually took the time to simulate it on a piece of paper. The problem will be somewhere else. But I write the code just out of my head so there might be some bugs (this code I posted last time is wrong too, I know). I usually test a lot when coding to get ...

Ok, the calculation was really a complete nonsense. I think I had a weak moment or something... :D Try this version. I implemented a debounce and repeat counter. If it doesn't work, try using this new calculation in the original code. //EDIT: Fixed an error in the debounce logic. //EDIT 2: There is ...