I certainly can post the definition files for PIC18F47Q10 though porting them to mC won't be much fun. You'll also have to correct the library list in .mlk file.
Good luck .
Search found 5375 matches
- 28 Sep 2023 16:34
- Forum: mikroC PRO for PIC General
- Topic: 18F16Q40 PIC MCU not present in MicroC v7.6.0 compiler MCU list
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1918
- 30 May 2023 23:01
- Forum: mikroPascal PRO for PIC General
- Topic: how to enable internal pull ups?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 18131
Re: how to enable internal pull ups?
Code depends on what you intend to do with RB1
Code: Select all
TRISB:=%11111101; // or %11111111 if RB1 should be an input as well
ANSELH:=%00000000; // or %00000100 if RB1 (AN10) is to be analog input
WPUB:=%00000010;
OPTION_REG.NOT_RBPU:=0;
- 29 May 2023 20:59
- Forum: mikroPascal PRO for PIC General
- Topic: how to enable internal pull ups?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 18131
Re: how to enable internal pull ups?
How to enable weak pull up resistor on all pins of PORTB except RB1 on PIC16F886 It's explained in the datasheet: Each of the PORTB pins has an individually configurable internal weak pull-up. Control bits WPUB<7:0> enable or disable each pull-up (see Register 3-7). Each weak pull-up is automatical...
- 25 May 2023 21:05
- Forum: mikroPascal PRO for PIC General
- Topic: Controlling the compiler from code
- Replies: 2
- Views: 365
Re: Controlling the compiler from code
This information cannot be controlled from code. It may only be set in IDE. Same goes for configuration words (single word in case of PIC16F874).
- 24 May 2023 12:42
- Forum: mikroC PRO for PIC General
- Topic: MikroC Pro - Abandonware?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 1453
Re: MikroC Pro - Abandonware?
Is it just a case of creating the device files for the missing devices manually based on their data sheets? I know its a bit of a long-winded annoying task but at least it would keep the show on the road. Yes, it's possible to write definition files for the processors you listed, and both compiler ...
- 20 May 2023 16:54
- Forum: mikroC PRO for PIC General
- Topic: MikroC Pro - Abandonware?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 1453
Re: MikroC Pro - Abandonware?
... it does look like necto has killed off the MikroC traditional compilers and that's a shame. Yes, that's exactly what happened. The PRO compilers not included in NECTO Studio will have their regular updates until they become a part of the NECTO. Studio. After that, it will not be recommended to ...
- 20 May 2023 16:17
- Forum: IDE Wish List
- Topic: Full language support
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1173
Re: Full language support
Will NECTO Studio ever get updated so that mikroPascal and mikroBASIC are part of the compiler? Note the "Save Harbour" statement preceding the promises The following outlines our general product direction and should be used for information purposes only. Although we do our best to do as planned, t...
- 03 Apr 2023 17:21
- Forum: mikroC PRO for PIC General
- Topic: PIC18F45Q10 or any Q series PIC
- Replies: 2
- Views: 677
Re: PIC18F45Q10 or any Q series PIC
Here you'll find how mE informed (or rather misled) its clients about these processors' implementation for last three years. I don't think you'll get any sensible answer now (well, maybe a repeat of promises for implementation under NECTO, which also have a long history). BTW, NECTO page contains a...
- 25 Feb 2023 01:31
- Forum: mikroC PRO for PIC General
- Topic: 18F16Q40 PIC MCU not present in MicroC v7.6.0 compiler MCU list
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1918
Re: 18F16Q40 PIC MCU not present in MicroC v7.6.0 compiler MCU list
i didn't discover 18Fxx*Q10 MCU in MikroC pro 7.60 MCU list ! And I didn't say it's there :) . What I did write though is true. With enough care and patience one may write definition files for Q10 processors and compiler will work with them. Due to shortage of K40 processors last year I had to swit...
- 15 Feb 2023 17:53
- Forum: mikroC PRO for PIC General
- Topic: 18F16Q40 PIC MCU not present in MicroC v7.6.0 compiler MCU list
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1918
Re: 18F16Q40 PIC MCU not present in MicroC v7.6.0 compiler MCU list
Sorry, I thought it was clear - both 18F16Q40 and 18F16Q41 fulfill your requirements (well ,except that no processor can have 20pins and 28 I/Os ).
- 15 Feb 2023 17:35
- Forum: mikroC PRO for PIC General
- Topic: Is there similar 16FL18346 MCU with more ROM memory than 28kb, same PinOut and 2K ram? SOLVED
- Replies: 1
- Views: 425
Re: Is there similar 16FL18346 MCU with more ROM memory than 28kb, same PinOut and 2K ram? SOLVED
If not too much of program memory missing, maybe you could optimize your code?
- 15 Feb 2023 17:08
- Forum: mikroC PRO for PIC General
- Topic: 18F16Q40 PIC MCU not present in MicroC v7.6.0 compiler MCU list
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1918
Re: 18F16Q40 PIC MCU not present in MicroC v7.6.0 compiler MCU list
Unfortunately, I don't have a better answer for your requirements than the 18F16Q40 or 18F16Q41 processors :( . The PIC AI compiler that comes with Necto can nominally work with this processors but there are no official definition files for this family and, due to some really stupid decisions, one c...
- 15 Feb 2023 16:09
- Forum: mikroC PRO for PIC General
- Topic: 18F16Q40 PIC MCU not present in MicroC v7.6.0 compiler MCU list
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1918
Re: 18F16Q40 PIC MCU not present in MicroC v7.6.0 compiler MCU list
Hi Leo, Unfortunately, except for Q10 processors, mC PRO will not work with Qxx ones due to their RAM structure. Compiler has some addresses hard coded and they cannot be moved by changes to definition files. Is possible buy PIC18FxxK42.mlk/PIC18FxxK40.mlk file definition? Definition files for these...
- 03 Feb 2023 01:58
- Forum: mikroC PRO for PIC General
- Topic: PIC16F18857 No access to EEPROM, failure on all sides
- Replies: 6
- Views: 735
Re: PIC16F18857 No access to EEPROM, failure on all sides
Actually the correct address is 0xF000 Yes, but compiler automatically adds 0xF000 to EEPROM address parameters in .mlk file so the addresses there do not need the offset. That fix allows me to use EEPROM Editor tool properly. Now I can set needed cells by values. :) But I still cant read and write...
- 02 Feb 2023 21:00
- Forum: mikroC PRO for PIC General
- Topic: PIC16F18857 No access to EEPROM, failure on all sides
- Replies: 6
- Views: 735
Re: PIC16F18857 No access to EEPROM, failure on all sides
That's due to error in definition file - follow instructions in this topic. The fix is for another processor but will work for yours as well.