Page 1 of 1

How does mikroPascal compare to other Pascal compilers ?

Posted: 15 Oct 2008 07:15
by johankrava
I would like to know how does mikroPascal compare to other Pascal compilers for 8051? I mean only the compiler: quality of generated code, used optimizations, known limitations, etc.

Anybody using it?

Posted: 17 Oct 2008 12:10
by filip
Our compilers are fully functional even in demo version.
Only limitation is that you can not generate hex file greater than 2K of program words.
I know this sounds like a small file, but 2K of program words is more than enough to do some basic
operations/projects. If you are going to make bigger more professional projects you should consider buying
a license for our compiler.
In addition there is extensive Help section, very good and reliable Support Desk and last but not the least
our forum and a considerably large community of users which are willing to help.

I hope you choose our compiler and may they lead you to your success and success of your company.

Posted: 26 Oct 2008 16:59
by Spacetime
Hey Johan,

If you are looking for fully functional Pascal compiler for 8051 with no limitations then take a look at Turbo51: http://turbo51.com
Borland Turbo Pascal 7 syntax, Floating point support, generates bin, hex, omf51 and asm files. Freeware.

Posted: 26 Oct 2008 20:41
by piort
hi, the only prob with turbopascal is : no editor and those are suggest dosent work with xp64...
i like the debugger include with ME product... that hlp when something go wrong... ;-)