VTFT AI remarks
Posted: 04 Oct 2021 10:05
Hi,
I Have tested Necto VTFT AI beta with a custom board - ssd1963 7inch TFT display 16bit communication interface and STM32F722 200Mhz ARM controller.
I am using trial mikroC AI for ARM (intend to buy a license).I like your compiler because of a small hex file footprint generated, for minimalistic graphic and hardware interface ,compared to other compilers.But I can't use it for now in my next projects because:
1.There is no screen orientation (portrait/landscape)
2.compared to classical VTFT software to fill/refresh image box larger than 150x150 pixels is very slow in 8bit mode but little bit faster in 16bit mode
3.Some bitmap images(especially monochrome bmp's) are not rendered or multiplied or scrambled in the image box,not tested yet with jpg
When will get VTFT AI out of beta ?... there is no roadmap for this tool...
Regards,
Levi
I Have tested Necto VTFT AI beta with a custom board - ssd1963 7inch TFT display 16bit communication interface and STM32F722 200Mhz ARM controller.
I am using trial mikroC AI for ARM (intend to buy a license).I like your compiler because of a small hex file footprint generated, for minimalistic graphic and hardware interface ,compared to other compilers.But I can't use it for now in my next projects because:
1.There is no screen orientation (portrait/landscape)
2.compared to classical VTFT software to fill/refresh image box larger than 150x150 pixels is very slow in 8bit mode but little bit faster in 16bit mode
3.Some bitmap images(especially monochrome bmp's) are not rendered or multiplied or scrambled in the image box,not tested yet with jpg
When will get VTFT AI out of beta ?... there is no roadmap for this tool...
Regards,
Levi