Page 2 of 2

Re: mikroElektronika ARM compilers: Development Update

Posted: 20 Oct 2011 16:13
by rmteo
To each his own. :D :D :D

Re: mikroElektronika ARM compilers: Development Update

Posted: 20 Oct 2011 16:17
by octal
We are polluting this topic, I think it's better that a moderator clean it and take off all our discussion to a new topic :roll:

Re: mikroElektronika ARM compilers: Development Update

Posted: 16 Nov 2011 11:59
by anikolic

Re: mikroElektronika ARM compilers: Development Update

Posted: 16 Nov 2011 16:01
by rmteo
Will it have virtual console services and semi-hosting support?

Re: mikroElektronika ARM compilers: Development Update

Posted: 27 Nov 2011 09:04
by maytere
Will mikroC for ARM support NXP (LPC series)?

Re: mikroElektronika ARM compilers: Development Update

Posted: 27 Nov 2011 19:22
by rmteo
maytere wrote:Will mikroC for ARM support NXP (LPC series)?
To be competitive, it would have to support Cortex-M0/3/4 devices from Atmel, Energy Micro, FreeScale, NXP, ST, TI/Stellaris and Toshiba.

Re: mikroElektronika ARM compilers: Development Update

Posted: 28 Nov 2011 18:58
by mLaki
ST, NXP and TI are the big shots in ARM business and must have in any compiler, any other supported company is welcome. I eagerly await to see how the debugger part of the new compilers will unfold. Will mE support third party debuggers or not and will their debugger support exotics like data and instruction trace.

Re: mikroElektronika ARM compilers: Development Update

Posted: 28 Nov 2011 19:57
by rmteo
For me, the benchmark is Rowley Crossworks for ARM, which does everything (and more) that has been asked here. The personal edition is about half the price ($150) of mikroC.

Re: mikroElektronika ARM compilers: Development Update

Posted: 09 Dec 2011 15:45
by anikolic